 |
|
2008 Audi A4 2.0T FrontTrak
Compare the A4 to the LaCrosse
List Price: $29,750
Invoice: $27,668
|
Audi A4 Advantages:
| CD Changer Standard |
| Better Highway Mileage (31 vs. 27) |
| Sunroof/Moonroof Standard |
Buick LaCrosse Advantages:
| Costs $1,435 Less |
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Larger Engine (3.6L vs. 2.0L) |
| Engine (6 cylinder vs. 4 Cylinder) |
| Automatic Transmission Standard |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| 40 More Horsepower (240 vs. 200) |
|
| |
|
2008 Chrysler 300 Touring AWD
Compare the 300 to the LaCrosse
List Price: $31,445
Invoice: $29,096
|
Chrysler 300 Advantages:
| 4WD/AWD Standard |
| 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
Buick LaCrosse Advantages:
| Costs $4,025 Less |
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| Side-Impact Air Bags Standard |
| Better Highway Mileage (27 vs. 18) |
| Better City Mileage (19 vs. 15) |
|
| |
|
2009 Lincoln MKZ
Compare the MKZ to the LaCrosse
List Price: $31,795
Invoice: $29,231
|
Lincoln MKZ Advantages:
| 6 Speed Automatic Transmission |
| CD Changer Standard |
| 23 More Horsepower (263 vs. 240) |
Buick LaCrosse Advantages:
| Costs $3,840 Less |
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
|
| |
|
2009 Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 2.0T
Compare the 9-3 Sport Sedan to the LaCrosse
List Price: $28,835
Invoice: $27,480
|
|
Buick LaCrosse Advantages:
| Costs $520 Less |
| Larger Engine (3.6L vs. 2.0L) |
| Engine (6 cylinder vs. 4 Cylinder) |
| Automatic Transmission Standard |
| Navigation System Standard |
| 30 More Horsepower (240 vs. 210) |
|
| |
|
2008 Volvo S60 2.5T
Compare the S60 to the LaCrosse
List Price: $30,885
Invoice: $29,067
|
Volvo S60 Advantages:
| 5 Speed Automatic Transmission |
Buick LaCrosse Advantages:
| Costs $2,570 Less |
| Theft-Tracking System Standard |
| Larger Engine (3.6L vs. 2.5L) |
| Engine (6 cylinder vs. 5 Cylinder) |
| Navigation System Standard |
| OnStar System Standard |
| Leather Seats Standard |
| 32 More Horsepower (240 vs. 208) |
|
| |