Car.com Home

  

  
Car.com HomeCar.com HomeNew Car QuoteBuy Used CarAuto Loans and Car FinanceNew Car Prices, Reviews, Pictures and Research

2009 Suzuki SX4 Review

Walkaround


» Overview
» Lineup
» Walkaround
» Interior
» Driving Impressions
» Summary

 

» Get Pricing
» Get Email Updates

» Get Consumer Ratings
» Read More Reviews

» Send a Letter
» More Auto News

If you like the tall look of modern compact hatchbacks you'll love the lines of the Suzuki SX4 Crossover. From the side, its profile has an uncanny resemblance to the Mercedes-Benz ML-Class SUV. That's not bad considering the ML has a much sleeker look to it than most SUVs.

It seems strange to talk about the SX4 Crossover in the same breath as an SUV, but it is exactly how Suzuki describes it in the U.S. The term crossover is normally used to suggest the vehicle crosses the line between truck-based SUV and car. By industry definitions, the SX4 Crossover is a compact hatchback, not a crossover SUV. But like most crossover SUVs it has a tailgate, fold-down rear seats for added cargo space and all-wheel drive. In Europe, where the car was designed and has been well received, it's described as a hatchback. There's nothing wrong with that in Europe, where hatchbacks are considered smart and practical. But hatchbacks have traditionally been unwelcome in the U.S., a shame because they are practical and make a lot of sense.

It's also a bit strange to talk about the SX4 Sport sedan as being sporty. While there is a definite wedge shape running front to rear, the SX4 Sport's tall greenhouse makes it look more like an economy car than a sporty runabout. In fact, the SX4 Sport is really an economy car with a small amount of sports appeal.

Both versions have a large windshield that slopes down to a hood that curves over large headlight/turn signal units. The curve of bodywork from the front of the distinctive front fenders extends down to the lower lip of the front bumper with its large air intake. The look is similar for the two body styles, but the front fascias differ. The Sport has differently shaped pods for the available fog lights and a lower aero add-on that is carried over into the body sides. The Crossover has flat-black caps along the rocker panels and over the fender flares.

One of the most unusual design cues of both body styles is the large quarter windows set in front of the front doors. At their base, these windows dip down from front to back, flowing into a rising line that leads to the back of the rear windows.

The Crossover's roof remains high all the way to the rear, and has wraparound glass at the rear behind the C-pillars. The Sport's roof turns down into a short trunk. The Sport sits lower than the Crossover, befitting their purposes: the Sport is intended to grip the pavement a bit better in corners, and the Crossover is better equipped for snow and unpaved roads. For the same reasons, the Sport gets 17-inch wheels with lower profile tires while the Crossover is fitted with 16-inch wheels and tires with slightly taller sidewalls. Each setup has its advantages and disadvantages, but the differences are not dramatic.

All in all, we found both body styles to be pleasing, though not swoopy or cutting edge. Neither car looks like it's too small, and they both have a modern stance.


<< Previous   Next >>
 
del.icio.us Save This Page   Digg!
 
 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
 
» FREE Price Quote
» Still looking? Pricing, safety info, reviews and photos
 

» Auto Insurance Quotes
» Get Auto Financing
» Free Credit Reports
» Vehicle History Reports

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Buy New | Buy Used | Finance | Research | Dealer Locator | About Us | Jobs | Dealer Inquiry | Intellectual Property | Privacy Policy | Usage Terms and Disclaimers
Powered by AIC - Automotive Information Center
Copyright 1996-2009 Car.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
Kelley Blue Book® and Blue Book® are trademarks of Kelley Blue Book Co., Inc.